4.6 Article

First member of an appealing class of cyclometalated 1,3-di-(2-pyridyl)benzene platinum(ii) complexes for solution-processable OLEDs

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY C
卷 8, 期 23, 页码 7873-7881

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0tc01565b

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Interuniversity Consortium of Materials Science and Technology [INSTMMI012]
  2. Universita degli Studi di Milano (Piano Sostegno alla Ricerca) [2015-17-LINEA 2, PSR2019_DIP_005_PI_CDRAG]
  3. CNR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The preparation and characterization of a new platinum(ii) complex bearing a (NCN)-C-boolean AND-N-boolean AND-cyclometalating ligand and a thiolate coligand, namely 5-mesityl-1,3-di-(2-pyridyl)benzene and 1-phenyl-1H-tetrazole-5-thiolate, is reported. Its structure is determined by X-ray diffraction studies on a single crystal. This new complex exhibits green and red phosphorescence in dichloromethane solution (phi(lum)= 0.90) and in the solid state (phi(lum)= 0.62), respectively. In both cases the quantum yield is impressive showing for the first time that (NCN)-C-boolean AND-N-boolean AND platinum(ii) complexes with a suitable thiolate coligand can reach outstanding luminescence properties. The excellent solubility of this complex allows fabrication of green processable solution-OLEDs with maximum EQE similar to that obtained with more expensive vacuum techniques and, depending on its concentration, one can tune the color of the OLED. The molecular geometry, ground state, electronic structure, and excited electronic states of the complex, both as a monomer and dimer aggregate in solution, are calculated by density functional theory (DFT) and time-dependent DFT approaches, giving insight into the electronic origin of the absorption spectra. Remarkably, the dimer is less sensitive to oxygen quenching than the monomer because the two 1-phenyl-1H-tetrazole fragments protect the platinum(ii) centers, as suggested by a combination of luminescence studies and theoretical calculations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据