4.5 Article

Drift-flux model for upward two-phase cross-flow in horizontal tube bundles

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIPHASE FLOW
卷 91, 期 -, 页码 170-183

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2017.01.013

关键词

Drift-flux model; Horizontal tube bundle; Shell-tube heat exchanger; Cross-flow; Void fraction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In relation to void fraction prediction of cross-flow in horizontal tube bundle of shell-tube heat exchangers, a drift-flux correlation has been developed to meet the demand on the study of two-phase flow gas and liquid velocities, two-phase pressure drop, heat transfer, flow patterns and flow induced vibrations in the shell side. Two critical parameters such as distribution parameter and drift velocity have been modeled. The distribution parameter is obtained by constant asymptotic values and taking into account the differences in channel geometry. The drift velocity is modelled depending on the density ratio and the non-dimensional viscosity number. The relationship between the channel averaged and gap mass velocity has been discussed in order to obtain the superficial gas and liquid velocities in the drift-flux correlation. The newly developed drift-flux correlation agrees well with cross-flow experimental databases of air-water, R-11 and R-113 in parallel triangular, normal square and normal triangular arrays with the mean absolute error of 1.06% and the standard deviation of 4.47%. In comparison with other existing correlations, the newly developed drift-flux correlation is superior to other studies due to the improved accuracy. In order to extend the applicability of the newly developed drift-flux correlation to void fraction of unity, an interpolation scheme has been developed. The newly developed drift-flux correlation is able to calculate the void fraction of cross-flow over a full range with different sub-channel configurations in shell-tube type heat exchangers. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据