4.6 Article

Synthesis, micellar structures and emission mechanisms of an AIE and DDED-featured fluorescent pH- and thermo-meter

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 10, 期 40, 页码 23532-23542

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0ra01000f

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21773215, 21543009]
  2. Innovative Research Grant for Undergraduate Students of Zhengzhou University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new nanoprobe, the luminescent diblock copolymerPNIPAM(MAh-4)-b-P4VP(PN4P), with pH- and thermo-responsive deprotonation-driven emission decay (DDED) and aggregation-induced emission (AIE) features was designed and synthesized. The nanoprobePN4Pcan form micellar structures in water with reversible dual-responsive fluorescence (FL) behavior within a wide pH range of 2-11. The critical solution temperature was found at about 32, 30 and 27 degrees C as the pH switched from 2, 7 to 11. The critical pH value of the probe was about 4.0, and the micelles showed a core-shell inversion in response to pH and thermal stimuli, accompanied by a desirable emission tunability.P4VPas the micellar shell at pH = 2 was more easily dehydrated with the increase in temperature as compared toPNIPAMas the micellar shell at pH > 4. The strongest dehydration of theP4VPshell would makePN4Pthe most strongly aggregated and the most AIE-active, which supports the 2.10-fold most distinguished thermal-responsive emission enhancement at pH = 2. Moreover, a dramatic acidochromic redshift of the emission band from 450 (pH > 4) to 490 nm (pH = 2) was observed, and the maximum emission at pH = 2 was enhanced by about 2.07-fold as compared with that at pH = 7. Therefore, the probe displays the desired dual responses and good reversibility. AIE and DDED are the two major mechanisms responsible for the dual-responsive emission change, with AIE playing a more important role than DDED. This work offers a promising approach to interpreting temperature (range from 28 to 40 degrees C) and pH changes (range from 2 to 7) in water.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据