3.9 Article

Risk factors associated with mortality in newborn infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia

期刊

ARCHIVOS ARGENTINOS DE PEDIATRIA
卷 118, 期 3, 页码 180-186

出版社

SOC ARGENTINA PEDIATRIA
DOI: 10.5546/aap.2020.eng.180

关键词

congenital diaphragmatic hernia; neonatal mortality; risk factors; pulmonary hypertension

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction. Morbidity and mortality are high in congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Some tools help to predict survival, both prenatally (observed/expected lung-to-head ratio [OE-LHR], presence of the liver in the chest) and postnatally (Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Study Group [CDHSG] score). Our objective was to identify the risk factors associated with mortality and estimate the risk-adjusted mortality in the prenatal period in the subgroup of patients with isolated left-sided hernia. Population and methods. Retrospective and analytical study of patients born at Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires between 2011 and 2018. A multivariate analysis was done to assess mortality-associated risk factors. For risk-adjusted mortality in the prenatal period, the ratio between the observed mortality and the mean expected mortality based on the OE-LHR was estimated. Results. A total of 53 patients were included. Their median gestational age was 38 weeks, and their mean birth weight was 3054 g. Isolated hernia was observed in 73 % of patients. Overall mortality was 45 %, and higher in patients with associated malformations. In the multivariate analysis, the presence of severe pulmonary hypertension estimated by postnatal echocardiogram was independently associated with mortality (adjusted odds ratio: 6.4, 95 % confidence interval: 1.02-40). The observed overall mortality in patients with isolated left-sided hernia was similar to that expected (ratio: 1.05). Conclusion. Overall mortality was similar to that expected based on the OE-LHR. In our population, severe pulmonary hypertension after birth was a determining factor of mortality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据