4.7 Article

Lipid and Glycolipid Isomer Analyses Using Ultra-High Resolution Ion Mobility Spectrometry Separations

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms18010183

关键词

lipids; glycolipids; isomers; ion mobility spectrometry

资金

  1. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences of the NIH [R01 ES022190]
  2. National Institute of General Medical Sciences [P41 GM103493]
  3. Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
  4. Microbes in Transition (MinT) Initiative at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
  5. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Biological and Environmental Research Genome Sciences Program
  6. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [U19AI106772]
  7. DOE [DE-AC05-76RL0 1830]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding the biological roles and mechanisms of lipids and glycolipids is challenging due to the vast number of possible isomers that may exist. Mass spectrometry (MS) measurements are currently the dominant approach for studying and providing detailed information on lipid and glycolipid presence and changes. However, difficulties in distinguishing the many structural isomers, due to the distinct lipid acyl chain positions, double bond locations or specific glycan types, inhibit the delineation and assignment of their biological roles. Here we utilized ultra-high resolution ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) separations by applying traveling waves in a serpentine multi-pass Structures for Lossless Ion Manipulations (SLIM) platform to enhance the separation of selected lipid and glycolipid isomers. The multi-pass arrangement allowed the investigation of paths ranging from similar to 16 m (one pass) to similar to 60 m (four passes) for the distinction of lipids and glycolipids with extremely small structural differences. These ultra-high resolution SLIM IMS-MS analyses provide a foundation for exploring and better understanding isomer-specific biological activities and disease processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据