3.8 Proceedings Paper

Radiological characterization of phosphate rocks, phosphogypsum, phosphoric acid and phosphate fertilizers in Morocco: An assessment of the radiological hazard impact on the environment

期刊

MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS
卷 27, 期 -, 页码 3234-3242

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.703

关键词

Phosphate rocks; Phosphate fertilizers; Naturally occurring radionuclides; ELCR; Gamma spectrometry; Alpha spectrometry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Radiological characterization of radionuclides contained in the phosphate rocks, phosphogypsum, phosphoric acid, and phosphates fertilizers (DAP, NPS, NPK, TSP, and TAP) in Morocco have been performed to provide a database for the assessment of the environmental and the radiological impacts. The measurements of the activity concentration were carried out using both alpha and gamma spectrometry. Additionally, the radiological parameters such as the gamma radiation hazard index, the internal and external hazard index as well as the outdoor and indoor absorbed gamma dose rates. The corresponding annual effective dose rates and the total excess lifetime cancer risk (ELCR) were also estimated to discuss the radiological hazard. The primary results showed that the activity concentrations of U-238, U-234, and U-235 were 174.58-2604.14, 143.03-2765.34 and 8.35-131.64 Bq kg(-1), respectively. The Th-230, Th-232 and Th-234 concentrations found were 239.29-1656.36, 0.68-17.71 and 133.54-2194.27 Bq kg(-1), respectively. The specific activities of Ra-226 and K-40 ranged from <1.97 to 1503.75 Bq kg(-1) and from <15.6 to 4710.59 Bq kg(-1), respectively. Moreover, the ELCR has been computed and found to be high in phosphate rocks and phosphogypsum, and comply with safety levels in phosphoric acid and most phosphate fertilizers. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of The Third International Conference on Materials and Environmental Science.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据