3.8 Proceedings Paper

Experimental investigation on bacterial concrete strength with Bacillus subtilis and crushed stone dust aggregate based on ultrasonic pulse velocity

期刊

MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS
卷 27, 期 -, 页码 1111-1117

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.01.478

关键词

Bacterial concrete; Compressive strength; UPV; Flexural strength; Bacillus subtilis

资金

  1. DST at Vignana Bharathi Institute of Technology (Autonomous), Aushapur, Ghatkeasr, Hyderabad, Telangana, India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The healing proportion of strengthening cracks in buildings such as Reinforced cement concrete (RCC) Houses, RCC Pipes, Canal Lining, Pavement etc. has been increased in the ongoing bacterial concrete. In order to fix the cracks in the concrete, it needs ordinary maintenance and exceptional treatment that can be terribly expensive. This is another method adopted by the use of microbiologically actuated calcite (CaCO3) precipitation in the arrangement of concrete. In this paper, an experimental study carried out using Bacillus subtilis bacteria and calcium lactate to heal the cracks in the concrete at different percent- ages such as 5%, 10% and 15% of cement weight for concrete grade M40. This paper presents the exper- imental results of the Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity (UPV) test carried out on Bacterial Concrete. From the Ultra sonic pulse velocity, dynamic modulus of elasticity and quality of concrete was determined at dif- ferent ages. Relationships have been proposed between the strength of Bacterial concrete and UPV. Scanning Electronic Microscopy analysis carried out on convention and bacterial concrete. Finally the maximum strength attain at 10% bacterial replacement in concrete and Scanning electronic microscopy shows the calcium carbonate formation in concrete which is healing the cracks. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Selection and peer -review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the First International con- ference on Advanced Lightweight Materials and Structures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据