4.6 Review

Anticancer effects of ginsenoside Rg3 (Review)

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR MEDICINE
卷 39, 期 3, 页码 507-518

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/ijmm.2017.2857

关键词

Panax ginseng; ginsenoside Rg3; natural product; tumor; adjuvant

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81502515, 81503332]
  2. Shanghai Natural Science Foundation [13ZR1431900]
  3. Shanghai Municipal Health and Family Planning Commission [20134173, 20134090, ZYXK2012010]
  4. Key Disciplines Group Construction Project of Pudong Health Bureau of Shanghai [PWZxq2014-12]
  5. Open Research Fund of State Key Laboratory Breeding Base of Systematic Research, Development and Utilization of Chinese Medicine Resources [ME2016012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cancer is a life-threatening disease with an alarmingly increased annual mortality rate globally. Although various therapies are employed for cancer, the final effect is not satisfactory. Chemotherapy is currently the most commonly used treatment option. However, the unsatisfactory efficacy, severe side-effects and drug resistance hinder the therapeutic efficacy of chemotherapeutic drugs. There is increasing evidence indicating that ginsenoside Rg3, a naturally occurring phytochemical, plays an important role in the prevention and treatment of cancer. The suggested mechanisms mainly include the induction of apoptosis, and the inhibition of proliferation, metastasis and angiogenesis, as well as the promotion of immunity. In addition, ginsenoside Rg3 can be used as an adjuvant to conventional cancer therapies, improving the efficacy and/or reducing adverse effects via synergistic activities. Ginsenoside Rg3 may be a widely applied natural medicine against cancer. To date however, there is no systematic summary available of the anticancer effects of ginsenoside Rg3. Therefore, in this review, all available literature over the past 10 years was reviewed and discussed in order to facilitate further research of ginsenoside Rg3.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据