4.6 Article

Improved FBG-Based Shape Sensing Methods for Vascular Catheterization Treatment

期刊

IEEE ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION LETTERS
卷 5, 期 3, 页码 4687-4694

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LRA.2020.3003291

关键词

Catheters; engineering management; instrumentation and measurement; optical fiber testing; shape measurement; surgical instruments; systems engineering and theory; system testing; system validation

类别

资金

  1. Flemish government VLAIO [HBC.2018.2046]
  2. FBGS International

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fiber optic shape sensing is gaining popularity within areas such as medical catheterization where catheters and guidewires are used to navigate through tortuous vascular paths. Shape sensing can aid medical interventionalists by reducing exposure to damaging radiation and providing a more detailed real-time understanding of the 3-dimensional shape of the catheter/guidewire. However, despite the technology existing for several years, there is still room for improvement and steps to follow to reach the accuracy and robustness needed for these safety-critical applications. This letter discusses and provides methods for fiber integration within catheters to improve shape estimation accuracy and repeatability. A two-step calibration process is introduced for intrinsic twist compensation, which results in significant improvements in estimation accuracy. Additionally, a practical method for fiber parameter identification is introduced. The importance of estimating these parameters was found to be paramount for reaching adequate shape estimation. Further improvements to the reconstruction algorithm are proposed. Experimental validations with ground truth shapes are performed to assess the overall accuracy for static and dynamic configurations. For complex geometrical shapes and a fiber length of 170 mm, experiments show a mean spatial error of 0.70 mm (0.41%), a maximum of 2.52 mm (1.48%), and repeatability of +/- 0.82 mm.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据