4.7 Article

Analysis of wrinkling during sheet hydroforming of curved surface shell considering reverse bulging effect

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.10.023

关键词

Unsupported wrinkling; Sheet hydroforming; Reverse bulging effect; Curved surface shell; Energy method

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [50905041, 51375114]
  2. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University [IRT1229]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Wrinkling in unsupported region is a worthy problem to be solved in sheet metal forming process. Sheet hydroforming is advantageous in the prevention of unsupported wrinkles. However, the simply increasing of liquid pressure is not enough to suppress the wrinkling even though with the occurrence of reverse bulging effect.1 In order to predict and control the wrinkling quantitatively in unsupported region for thin-walled shells with curved surface, a theoretical model on critical wrinkling stress was proposed by considering proper reverse bulging effect based on energy method. The influence of liquid pressure and other parameters on the critical wrinkling stress was analyzed. The critical loading path of the liquid pressure to control wrinkling was obtained by combining critical wrinkling stresses and circumferential stresses. An experimental setup for an extremely thin-walled shell with semi-ellipsoidal geometry was designed and manufactured to verify the theoretical model. It is found that at a certain punch stroke, the magnitude of the critical wrinkling stress increases and that of circumferential compressive stress decreases with the improvement of the liquid pressure. The critical loading path can be utilized to get well formed shells with a ratio of thickness to diameter equals 0.27% in the experiments. The proposed method can be applied to predict and control wrinkling in unsupported region for hydroforming of thin-walled shell with high accuracy and considerably reduced simulation time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据