4.6 Article

NUICNet: Non-Uniform Illumination Correction for Underwater Image Using Fully Convolutional Network

期刊

IEEE ACCESS
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 109989-110002

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3002593

关键词

Lighting; Imaging; Feature extraction; Mathematical model; Optical filters; Filtering algorithms; Scattering; Underwater image enhancement; illumination correction; deep learning; fully convolutional network; dilated convolution

资金

  1. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019M652472]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [201813019, 201861009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Absorption and scattering in aqueous media would attenuate light and make imaging difficult. Therefore, an artificial light source is usually utilized to assist imaging in the deep ocean. However, the artificial light source typically alters the light conditions to a large extent, resulting in the non-uniform illumination of images. To solve this problem, we propose a non-uniform illumination correction algorithm based on a fully convolutional network for underwater images. The proposed algorithm model the original image as the addition of the ideal image and a non-uniform light layer. We replace the traditional pooling layer with dilated convolution to expand the receptive field and achieve higher accuracy in non-uniform illumination recognition. To improve the perception ability of the network effectively, the original image and parameters which pre-trained on the ImageNet are concentrated. The concentrated information is used as input to the network. Due to the color shift and blurred details of the underwater image, we design the novel loss function, which includes three parts of feature loss, smooth loss, and adversarial loss. Moreover, we built a dataset of the underwater image with non-uniform illumination. Experiments show that our method performs better in subjective assessment and objective assessment than some traditional methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据