4.7 Article

Nonlinear analysis of functionally graded nanoscale beams incorporating the surface energy and microstructure effects

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL SCIENCES
卷 131, 期 -, 页码 908-923

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.07.055

关键词

FG nanobeams; Nonlinear analysis; Surface elasticity theory; Modified couple stress theory; Generalized differential quadrature method (GDQM); Nonclassical boundary conditions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A nonclassical size dependent beam model is developed to study the geometrically nonlinear response of functionally graded (FG) nanoscale beams including the combined effect of surface elasticity, surface residual stress, microstructure and size-dependency. To this, the Gurtin-Murdoch surface elasticity theory in combination with the modified couple stress theory is employed to capture the simultaneous effects of surface energy and microstructure size phenomenon. Euler Bernoulli and Timoshenko beam models considering the von Karman geometric nonlinearity are adopted. The material properties of the bulk and surface of the FG beam are assumed to be changed continuously through the thickness according to a power law scheme and Mori-Tanaka homogenization technique. The geometrically nonlinear size dependent governing equations and corresponding nonclassical boundary conditions are exactly obtained through Hamilton's principle. The generalized differential quadrature method (GDQM) is employed to discretize the nonlinear nonclassical governing differential equations and the nonclassical boundary conditions for various end supports. A good agreement between the results of the present model and those available in the literature is obtained. Selected numerical results show explicitly that the material length scale parameter, surface elastic modulus, surface residual stress, gradient index and material distribution have a significant influence on the geometrically nonlinear bending response of FG nanobeams. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据