4.6 Article

The simple-preparation of Cu-Ni/CuO-NiO using solution plasma for application in a glucose enzyme-free sensor

期刊

NEW JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY
卷 44, 期 26, 页码 10806-10812

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0nj01464h

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51772148]
  2. Top-notch Academic Programs Project of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (TAPP) [PPZY2015B128]
  3. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)
  4. Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The design of composite catalysts with two metals and their oxides for the detection of glucose is a particularly novel method to couple together the advantages of different kinds of metals. In this study, a simple and rapid method was used for preparing composite catalysts for use as glucose sensors. We used the solution plasma technique to synthesize a Cu-Ni/CuO-NiO precursor in an open system without any chemical additions in a shorter time. Cu-Ni/CuO-NiO catalysts derived from the subsequent heat treatment of precursors show high performance as glucose electrochemical sensors with a fast reaction time (similar to 1 s) and a low detection limit (54 nM). There are two linear detection ranges of 0 to 0.35 mM and 0.35 to 9.85 mM, with sensitivities of 2637.282 and 923.084 mu A mM(-1)cm(-2), respectively. The Cu-Ni/CuO-NiO catalyst exhibits good stability (retaining 90.68% current density after 42 days) and reproducibility (relative standard deviation (RSD) = 1.72%, 3.28%). In addition, it has excellent selectivity for glucose in the presence of interfering substances. These improved performances were considered to result from the synergistic effects between the two metals and their metal oxides. Furthermore, this work provides novel insights into the development of a solution plasma method that could provide a useful approach for fabricating other highly efficient electrocatalysts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据