4.2 Article

Atrial fibrillation, venous thromboembolism, ischemic stroke, and all-cause mortality: The Tromso study

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/rth2.12351

关键词

atrial fibrillation; cohort studies; mortality; stroke; venous thromboembolism

资金

  1. Stiftelsen Kristian Gerhard Jebsen
  2. Northern Norway Regional Health Authority

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with increased risk of ischemic stroke and all-cause mortality. Patients with AF are also at increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), but information on how AF impacts VTE-related mortality is scarce. Objectives: To investigate the impact of AF on all-cause mortality in subjects with and without a thromboembolic event (VTE or ischemic stroke). Methods: We followed 29 833 participants from the Tromso study (1994-2008) through 2013 and recorded all deaths during follow-up. Incident AF, VTE, and ischemic stroke were registered as time-dependent exposures. We calculated mortality rates (MRs) by exposure during follow-up and obtained hazard ratios (HRs) for death with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: A total of 2087 AF cases, 756 VTEs, and 1279 ischemic strokes were registered during a median follow-up of 18.7 years, and 4797 people (16.1%) died. The age-adjusted MR for participants without any event was 1.19 per 100 person-years (PY; 95% CI, 1.15-1.23). Compared to these participants, subjects with the joint AF + VTE exposure had a 3.7-fold increased risk of death (HR, 3.67; 95% CI, 2.77-4.66) in age- and sex-adjusted analyses, similar to the risk observed for VTE alone (HR, 3.76; 95% CI, 3.28-4.30). Participants with stroke had a 2.9-fold increased risk of death (HR, 2.85; 95% CI, 2.56-3.18), and the risk was further increased in participants with both AF and stroke (HR, 4.38; 95% CI, 3.85-4.98). Conclusions: AF was significantly associated with increased risk of death in participants with incident stroke. In contrast, concomitant AF was not associated with excess mortality risk in VTE patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据