4.3 Article

Development of pressed sulfide powder tablets for in situ sulfur and lead isotope measurement using LA-MC-ICP-MS

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MASS SPECTROMETRY
卷 421, 期 -, 页码 255-262

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijms.2017.07.015

关键词

LA-MC-ICP-MS; Lead isotope; Sulfur isotope; Homogeneity; Accuracy

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41421002, 41427804, 41373004]
  2. MOST Research Foundation from the State Key Laboratory of Continental Dynamics [207010021]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Controlling the accuracy and precision of sulfur and lead isotopic compositions in natural sulfide minerals requires the use of well-characterized reference materials with matrices similar to those of the unknown samples being analyzed. However, it is often a challenge to prepare natural or synthetic reference materials with homogeneous isotope compositions on a micro-scale. Herein, we report a novel method to synthesize homogeneous sulfide reference materials in the form of nano-particulate pressed sulfide powder tablets (PSPTs). Non-matrix-matched external calibration was used to obtain accurate and precise lead isotopic ratios, while mass bias was corrected using a standard-sample bracketing method and a thallium standard solution doping process. In situ analysis of lead isotopic ratios of PSPTs using laser ablation multi-collector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-MC-ICP-MS) yielded good external precisions of <0.026% for Pb-207,Pb-208/Pb-206 and <0.057% for Pb-206,Pb-207,Pb-208/Pb-204 (2RSD). Meanwhile, the standard deviations of results afforded by LA-MC-ICP-MS were better than 0.41%. for S-34/S-32 (2SD). The in situ analytical results of PSPTs were consistent with the values obtained using solution nebulizer MC-ICP-MS, thus demonstrating the reliability and robustness of our analytical protocol. This method can also be used to synthesize different material matrices with homogeneous sulfur and lead isotopes to correct mass bias when using standard-sample bracketing for in situ analysis. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据