4.8 Article

Electrochemical intercalations of divalent ions inside Ni/Zn co-doped cobalt sulfide nanoparticle decorated carbon spheres with superior capacity

期刊

NANOSCALE
卷 12, 期 26, 页码 14267-14278

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0nr02761h

关键词

-

资金

  1. Jiangsu University of Science and Technology Research Start-Up Fund [1062921905]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Among post-lithium ion batteries, magnesium ion batteries (MIBs) are receiving growing attention due to their divalent nature, intrinsic low cost, dendrite free cycling, and atmospheric stability. However, their realization is constrained because of the absence of suitable cathodes that can accommodate Mg(2+)with fast reversibility. To bypass the sluggish movement of Mg(2+)ions inside the cathode and utilize the full advantage of the Mg anode, a Mg2+/Li(+)hybrid ion battery (MLIB) is introduced here with rationally designed porous Ni/Zn co-doped CoS2@C spheres as the cathode material. The Ni/Zn-CoS2@C cathode with high porosity and electrical conductivity showed an appreciable specific capacity of 158 mA h g(-1)at 20 mA g(-1)for MIBs, which was significantly boosted up to 667 mA h g(-1)at a current density of 50 mA g(-1)by employing Mg2+/Li(+)hybrid electrolytes. Their specific capacity and the corresponding energy density (614 W h Kg(-1)) are the highest among MLIBs and comparable to those of lithium ion batteries. Furthermore, MLIBs displayed significant cycling stability by retaining the maximum specific capacities of 324.6 and 230 mA h g(-1)at 100 and 500 mA g(-1), respectively after 100 cycles. The excellent electrochemical properties of the synthesized cathodes are attributed to their high porosities and electrical conductivities, the synergistic effect of doped species and their capability to accommodate both Mg(2+)and Li(+)ions without side reactions. Variousex situcharacterization tools were employed to develop further understanding of the intercalation chemistries and mechanisms of both Mg(2+)and Li(+)ions inside host materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据