4.1 Article

The relation between nursing students' levels of self-efficacy and caring nurse-patient interaction: a descriptive study

期刊

CONTEMPORARY NURSE
卷 56, 期 2, 页码 185-198

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10376178.2020.1782763

关键词

nurse-patient interaction; caring; self-efficacy and sufficiency; nursing student

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background:Nursing is a process of interpersonal interaction. Objective:To determine the relationship between the self-efficacy levels and caring nurse-patient interactions of nursing students. Methods:The study was carried out with 198 students who agreed to participate. The data was collected by using personal information forms, the Caring Nurse-Patient Interaction Scale (CNPIS), and the Self-Efficacy-Sufficiency Scale (SES). Collected data were evaluated via descriptive statistics, independent groupt-test, ANOVA, and Tukey HSD and Pearson Correlation analysis. Results:CNPIS sub-dimension point averages were 309.94 +/- 34.71 for importance, 278.97 +/- 40.81 for competency, and 264.04 +/- 46.17 for feasibility. It was determined that there are statistically significant, strong, and positive relations between all sub-dimension of the scale. It was also determined that the scale sub-dimension point averages differ in a statistically significant way on the basis of certain demographic attributes (sex and age of the students (p<0.05)). Furthermore, a statistically significant, positive and medium level relation was determined between the CNPIS importance and competence point averages and SES total points (rimportance: 0.318, pimportance: 0.000; rcompetence: 0.322, pcompetence: 0.000) Conclusions:It was concluded that students scored high points from all sub-dimensions of the CNPIS. It was further determined that students with high levels of self-efficacy/sufficiency have higher levels of caring for nurse-patient interaction. Impact statement:Adequate self-efficacy and sufficiency will be able to provide better nurse-patient interaction which based on care.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据