4.7 Review

Photoelectrode nanomaterials for photoelectrochemical water splitting

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 42, 期 16, 页码 11078-11109

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.03.029

关键词

Photoelectrochemical; Water splitting; Electrocatalysis; Photocatalysis; Nanomaterials

资金

  1. LRF (Lloyd's Register Foundation) UK

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Photoelectrochemical (PEC) water splitting is among the most promising approaches for energy conversion due to its practical efficiency. Unfortunately, many works simply test typical cases without profound insight, and this does not lead us very far. Two concepts are usually neglected: (i) the rate-determining step is usually the electrocatalytic process conducting the water splitting, and thus, the interfacial reaction at the electrode surface can be practically more important that the absorption of photons by the semiconductors, and (ii) the architecture of nanomaterials can directly control both photon absorption and electrochemical catalysis. While narrating the importance of the first concept the primary focus of the present review focuses on the second concept to summarize the general effects of nanostructures on the PEC performance. The nano-architecture has a larger impact on the electrocatalytic properties of the photoelectrode rather than light harvesting capability, but this feature is usually neglected. In fact, designing a nano-architecture is a tuning process to balance a series of different processes, which are in competition in a complicated system, for optimizing the PEC performance. The most important task is to maximize the number of electrocatalytic sites and forming a more effective electrode/electrolyte interface while reducing the number of charge recombination centers. Nano structuring is normally in favor of the former while unfavorably supporting the latter. (C) 2017 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据