4.7 Article

Catalytic performance of Samaria-promoted Ni and Co/SBA-15 catalysts for dry reforming of methane

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 42, 期 39, 页码 24811-24822

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.08.080

关键词

Dry reforming of methane; Samaria promoter; Cobalt catalyst; Nickel catalyst

资金

  1. Semnan University
  2. Nanonafez Company in Semnan University Science and Technology Park
  3. Semnan University Science and Technology Park

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Methane reforming with CO2 over Samaria-promoted Ni and Co/SBA-15 was comparatively investigated. The Co, Ni (10%wt) and Sm (0.5, 1 and 1.5%wt) ions were introduced by two solvent impregnation method. The Ni and Co catalysts with/without promoter, were examined by N2 adsorption-desorption, x-ray diffraction (XRD), high resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), temperature programmed reduction (TPR) and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) methods, and then evaluated in CO2 reforming of methane. The XRD and TEM results indicated that Ni and Co/SBA-15 promoted by 1%wt of Samaria, had the smallest NiO and Co3O4 particles size and the highest dispersion; as a result, they would rather studying dry reforming of methane test. Catalytic results indicated that Samaria promoted Ni/SBA-15 had the highest conversion (CH4 conversion similar to 58% at 700 degrees C, while a remarkable decrease of catalytic activity was observed over Samaria-promoted Co/SBA-15 (CH4 conversion similar to 25% at 700 degrees C). The positive effect of Samaria on Ni/SBA-15 catalyst activity is probably due to smaller NiO particles, higher NiO dispersion and lower trend to carbon deposition. On the contrary, the negative effect of Samaria on Co/SBA-15 catalyst activity is maybe due to Co oxidation to inactive phase and sintering of Co particles in high temperatures. (C) 2017 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据