4.7 Article

Effect of transition metal on stability and activity of La-Ca-M-(Al)-O (M = Co, Cr, Fe and Mn) perovskite oxides during partial oxidation of methane

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 42, 期 31, 页码 19920-19934

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.06.075

关键词

Lanthanum perovskite oxides; Methane; Catalytic partial oxidation; Transition metals; Syngas

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic under National Sustainability Programme II [LQ1601]
  2. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic [LM2011020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Perovskite oxides of the type of LaxCa1-xMyAl1-yO3-delta (M = Co, Cr, Fe, Mn; x = 0.5; y = 0.7-1.0) were prepared using the polymerization methods and evaluated via N-2 adsorption, X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM), energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectroscopy, temperature-programmed reduction by hydrogen (TPR-H-2) and temperature-programmed oxidation by oxygen (TPO-O-2). Catalytic behaviour of the perovskite oxides during methane oxidation was studied using a tubular fixed-bed reactor. In a partial oxidation, which proceeded in two steps, there was total oxidation in the first step and CO2 and H2O were formed; in the second step, the total oxidation products oxidized methane by (dry and wet) reforming reactions to yield CO and H-2. Total oxidation and the two reforming reactions proceeded on two types of an active centre formed by transition metal ions, oxygen vacancies and oxide ions. The catalytic system La-Ca-Co-Al-O which contained aluminium, decomposed in partial oxidation of methane (POM) into a composite that contained firmly bonded cobalt nanoparticles in the surface of a substrate made up of La2O3, CaO and Al2O3 which catalysed POM with a high methane conversion and hydrogen selectivity. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据