4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Hydrogen generation via hydrolysis of H-CaMg2 and H-CaMg1.9Ni0.1

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 42, 期 35, 页码 22312-22317

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.05.159

关键词

Hydrogen generation; CaMg1.9Ni0.1 alloy; Hydrolysis; Apparent activation energy

资金

  1. Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC51621001]
  2. International Science & Technology Cooperation Program of China [2015DFA51750]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51431001]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province of China [2016A030312011, 2014A030311004]
  5. Guangdong Province Universities and Colleges Pearl River Scholar Funded Scheme
  6. [2014GKXM011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydrogen generation via hydrolysis of hydrides from hydrogenated CaMg2 (abbreviated as H-CaMg2 hereafter) and hydrogenated CaMg1.9Ni0.1 (abbreviated as H-CaMg1.9Ni0.1 hereafter) alloys has been investigated in pure water without addition of any catalyst. Experimental results show that the hydrolysis of H-CaMg2 is fast when immersed in water with the hydrogen generation yield of 800 mL/g within 1 min. For CaMg1.9Ni0.1 alloy, the addition of Ni element spurs the hydrogen absorption at room temperature and significantly enhances the hydrolysis properties with fast and continuous hydrogen release yield of 1053 mL/g in 12 min, which is 94.6% of the theoretical hydrogen yield of H-CaMg1.9Ni0.1. The excellent hydrolysis properties of Ca5Mg9H28 and the catalytic effect of MgNi2 particles are further clarified. The fast and constant hydrolysis rate of H-CaMg1.9Ni0.1 can reach higher even than 365 mL/(min g) in first 2 min. The apparent activation energy of H-CaMg1.9Ni0.1 hydrolysis in deionized water is determined to be 32.9 kJ/mol. The hydrolysis mechanism of H-CaMg2 and H-CaMg1.9Ni0.1 was also discussed. (C) 2017 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据