4.7 Article

Plasma-etched, S-doped graphene for effective hydrogen evolution reaction

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 42, 期 7, 页码 4184-4192

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.09.142

关键词

Hydrogen evolution reaction; Metal-free electrocatalysts; Heteroatom-doped graphene; S-doped graphene; Plasma-etching

资金

  1. Engineering Technology Research Center of Population Health Informatization in Hebei Province
  2. Application Technology Research and Development Center of Medical Informatics in Hebei Universities
  3. Science and Technology Department of Hebei Province Project [16961301D]
  4. Zhanpjiakou Science and Technology Research and Development Project [1511075B]
  5. Health Department of Hebei Province Project [20160030]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Heteroatom-doped graphene as highly efficient metal-free electrocatalyst is emerging as the most promising alternative to Pt-based electrocatalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction (HER). However, developing heteroatom-doped graphene with competitive HER activity remains a great challenge. Here, we reported an effective strategy to employ plasma etching method to create more topological defects on S-doped graphene, and obtained plasma-etched, S-doped graphene exhibited a significantly enhanced HER activity with an overpotential of 178 mV at a current density of 10 mA cm(-2). It was proved that the synergetic coupling between S-doping and plasma-induced topological defects contributed to the excellent HER performance. We further showed that the combination of high S-doping level with thiophene-S-rich species and appropriate amount of topological defects could maximize the HER activity. The successful combination of plasma-assisted defect engineering and heteroatom-doping in this work may open up a new pathway for developing highly efficient graphene-based metal-free catalysts toward HER. (C) 2016 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据