4.7 Article

Evaluation of carbon supported platinum-ruthenium nanoparticles for ammonia electro-oxidation: Combined fuel cell and electrochemical approach

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 42, 期 1, 页码 193-201

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.09.135

关键词

Ammonia electro-oxidation; PtRu/C nanoparticles; Electrolysis; Direct ammonia fuel cell

资金

  1. FAPESP [2013/01577-0, 2014/09868-6]
  2. CNPq
  3. Canada Foundation for Innovation
  4. NSERC
  5. National Research Council Canada
  6. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  7. Government of Saskatchewan
  8. Western Economic Diversification Canada
  9. University of Saskatchewan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ammonia electro-oxidation reaction (AmER) was investigated by using conventional electrochemical experiments, direct ammonia fuel cell (DAFC) and galvanostatic electrolysis experiments. The working electrode/anodes were composed of carbon supported PtRu/C nanoparticles (NPs) with atomic Pt:Ru ratios of 100:0, 90:10, 70:30 and 50:50. The resulting nanoparticles ranged between 5.1 and 7.3 nm in size depending on the Ru content and were analyzed by XRD, TEM and synchrotron radiation photoelectron Spectroscopy (SRPES). Alloying Pt with Ru shifted AmER to the lower onset potentials compared to Pt/C. Among nanostructured PtRu/C electrocatalysts, the Pt90Ru10 composition showed the best activity and stability in the conventional electrochemical (cyclic voltammetry and chronoamperometry) experiments, DAFC and 8 h galvanostatic electrolysis. The concentration of nitrite and nitrate was doubled using PtRu/C 90:10 compared to Pt/C, because of excess of OHads species formed on Ru. The results show that the addition of small amount of Ru to Pt NPs improves the AmER due to additional formation of OHads that promote the reaction on alloyed PtRu nanoparticles. Crown Copyright (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据