4.7 Article

Facile synthesis of AuPd/g-C3N4 nanocomposite: An effective strategy to enhance photocatalytic hydrogen evolution activity

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 42, 期 36, 页码 22765-22775

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.07.154

关键词

Photocatalysis; AuPd; H-2 evolution; g-C3N4 nanosheets

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [51572295, 21003157, 21273285]
  2. Beijing Nova Program [2008B76]
  3. Science Foundation of China University of Petroleum, Beijing [KYJJ2012-06-20, 2462016YXBS05]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AuPd bimetallic nanoparticle (NP) modified ultra -thin graphitic carbon nitride nanosheet photocatalysts were synthesized via photochemical deposition-precipitation followed by hydrogen reduction. The crystal structure, chemical properties, and charge carrier behavior of these photocatalysts were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), surface photovoltage spectroscopy (SPS), transient photovoltage spectroscopy (TPV), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), and UV-Vis diffuse-reflectance spectroscopy (DRS). Photocatalytic H-2 evolution experiments indicate that the hydrogen treated AuPd nanoparticles can effectively promote the separation efficiency of electron-hole pairs photo-excited in the g-C3N4 photocatalyst, which consequently promotes photocatalytic H-2 evolution. The 1.0 wt% AuPd/g-C3N4 (H-2) composite photocatalyst showed the best performance with a corresponding photocatalytic H-2 evolution rate of 107 mu mol h(-1). The photocatalyst can maintain most of its photocatalytic activity after four photocatalytic experiment cycles. These results demonstrate that the synergistic effect of light reduction and hydrogen reduction of AuPd and g-C3N4 help to greatly improve the photocatalytic activity of the composite photocatalyst. (C) 2017 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据