4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Hydrogen production via methanol steam reforming over Ni-based catalysts: Influences of Lanthanum (La) addition and supports

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 42, 期 6, 页码 3647-3657

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.08.165

关键词

Hydrogen production; Methanol steam reforming; Lanthanum; Ni-based catalyst; Supports

资金

  1. NSFC (National Natural Science Foundation of China) [U1402233, 21267011, 21367015]
  2. Young Academic and Technical Leader Raising Foundation of Yunnan Province [2008py010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of the addition of Lanthanum (La), the different loading of nickel oxide and various supports on the catalytic performance of Ni-based catalysts was investigated for methanol steam reforming to produce hydrogen. TEM, N-2 adsorption-desorption, XRD, and TPR were used to characterize the catalysts. Separated NiO particles, La-Ni or La-Ni-Al mixed oxides as well as NiAl2O4 spinel were detected. The results showed that the addition of lanthanum into Ni-based catalyst decreased the steamed temperature and the selectivity of CO. This change was closely associated with separated NiO particles with the smaller size and higher dispersion as well as the different interaction between NiO particles and support upon the modification of lanthanum. It was also found that the moderate loading of nickel facilitates the catalytic performance for methanol steam reforming due to the generation of separated NiO species with moderate particle size. Moreover, the different interaction strength between nickel species and support could give rise to the difference in the catalytic performance of active Ni species, depending on the support. The Al2O3 supported catalyst exhibits better conversion of CH3OH, higher hydrogen selectivity and lower CO selectivity than those of SiO2 and MgO supported catalysts. (C) 2016 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据