4.7 Article

Z-scheme BCN-TiO2 nanocomposites with oxygen vacancy for high efficiency visible light driven hydrogen production

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 42, 期 47, 页码 28434-28444

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.09.125

关键词

TiO2; BCN; Z-scheme; Nanocomposites; Photocatalytic H-2 production

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21673066, 21103042]
  2. University Key Teacher Project from the Education Department of Henan Province
  3. Program for Science & Technology Innovation Talents from the University of Henan Province [15HASTIT043]
  4. Innovative Research Team from the University of Henan Province [16IRTSTHN015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BCN-TiO2 nanocomposites are obtained by a simple calcination method using a hexagonal boron carbon nitride (BCN) semiconductor and nanotubular titanic acid (NTA) as precursors. The BCN-TiO2 nanocomposites are characterized systematically by XRD, TEM, XPS, DRS, ESR, BET, I-t and PL techniques. Compared with the novel TiO2 or single BCN sample, the BCN-TiO2 nanocomposites prepared by a calcination method show the highest photocatalytic activity for hydrogen production under visible-light irradiation. The photocatalytic activity of BCN-TiO2 nanocomposites is optimized by changing the amount of BCN. Characterization results confirm that a large amount of single electron oxygen vacancies can be formed when NTA was calcined at the higher temperature, which is beneficial to the enhancement of visible light absorption and the transfer of photogenerated carriers due to the formation of ohmic contact at the interface between BCN and novel TiO2. Therefore, the visible light photocatalytic activity for H-2 production of BCN-TiO2 nanocomposites has been improved significantly by the formation of BCN-TiO2 Z-scheme photocatalyst, which results in efficient space separation of photo-induced charge carriers. (C) 2017 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据