3.8 Article

Preschool Teachers' Perspectives About the Engagement of Immigrant and Non-Immigrant Parents in Their Children's Early Education

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EARLY CHILDHOOD
卷 52, 期 2, 页码 213-231

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13158-020-00269-1

关键词

Preschool teachers; Teacher beliefs; Cultural diversity; Parent engagement; Family-preschool partnerships

资金

  1. Projekt DEAL
  2. German Federal Ministry for Family Affairs, Senior Citizens, Women and Youth

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present study explores the perceptions of teachers about the engagement of immigrant and non-immigrant parents in preschool. Data were drawn from a larger evaluation study of a government initiative for preschools in Germany, which was designed to foster inclusive pedagogy and parent cooperation. In these analyses, teachers' perceptions of the engagement of immigrant parents and non-immigrant parents were rated for each parent group, on a 10-item measure, to identify how teacher ratings varied for the different parent groups. Data from 1397 preschool teachers, employed across 203 preschools, were analyzed using multilevel modeling. This statistical approach takes account of the clustered nature of the data. Teacher ratings of engagement for immigrant and non-immigrant parent groups differed between preschools. Most variability in the ratings could be ascribed to preschool characteristics. In preschools, in which staff held a shared understanding of dealing with cultural diversity and in which the director of the preschool had a multicultural mindset, teachers perceived engagement of parents more positively, especially for immigrant parents. Overall, the findings identified the importance of self-efficacy for inclusion and more positive beliefs about multiculturalism among preschool teachers. Such qualities are important for working with all parents. However, unfavorable social structures, such as those found in disadvantaged areas, may present major challenges for parent cooperation and engagement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据