4.6 Article

A Novel Method for Predicting Tensile Strength of Friction Stir Welded AA6061 Aluminium Alloy Joints Based on Hybrid Random Vector Functional Link and Henry Gas Solubility Optimization

期刊

IEEE ACCESS
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 79896-79907

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2990137

关键词

Friction stir welding; 6061Aluminum alloy; tensile strength; artificial neural network; Henry gas solubility optimization; random vector functional link

资金

  1. State Key Laboratory of Special Rare Metal Materials [SKL2018K004j]
  2. Northwest Rare Metal Materials Research Institute Ningxia Co., Ltd.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aluminum alloys have low weldability by conventional fusion welding processes. Friction stir welding (FSW) is a promising alternative to traditional fusion welding techniques for producing high quality aluminum joints. The quality of the welded joints is highly dependent on the process parameters used during welding. In this research, a new approach was developed to predict the process parameters and mechanical properties of AA6061-T6 aluminium alloy joints in terms of ultimate tensile strength (UTS). A new hybrid artificial neural network (ANN) approach has been proposed in which Henry Gas Solubility Optimization (HGSO) algorithm has been incorporated to improve the performance of Random Vector Functional Link (RVFL) network. The HGSO-RVFL model was constructed with four parameters; rotational speed, welding speed, tilt angle, and pin profile. The validity of the model was tested, and it was demonstrated that the HGSO-RVFL model is a powerful technique for predicting the UTS of friction stir welded (FSWD) joints. In addition, the effects of process parameters on UTS of welded joints were discussed, where a significant agreement was observed between experimental results and predicted results which indicates the high performance of the model developed to predict the appropriate welding parameters that achieve optimal UTS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据