4.7 Article

Pt/C containing different platinum loadings for use as electrocatalysts in alkaline PBI-based direct glycerol fuel cells

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 42, 期 36, 页码 23095-23106

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.07.125

关键词

Direct glycerol fuel cells; Alkaline; Electrocatalysts; Platinum percentage; Product selectivity

资金

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) [474381/2013-7]
  2. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study shows the influence of the Pt percentage in Pt catalysts (Pt/C) on their application in Direct Glycerol Fuel Cells (DGFC). Catalysts with 20, 30, 40 and 60% Pt were prepared by formic acid reduction. X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) confirmed the formation of Pt fcc nanocrystals (with average sizes between 3 and 4 nm). Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) corroborated the Pt loadings and the Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) images show a homogeneous distribution of the Pt nanoparticles, with larger particles at higher Pt percentages. Electrochemical measurements reveal that higher Pt percentages promote the activity of the glycerol electroxidation reaction, resulting in lower onset potentials, higher current densities and reduced poisoning of the Pt surface. Single cell tests confirm these results, with greater maximum power density at higher Pt percentages, although the glycerol crossover effect starts to become significant in the 60% Pt/C catalyst, owing to the reduced thickness of this catalytic layer. A final product selectivity analysis indicates that tartronate is the preferential glycerol electroxidation product, along with glycerate and oxalate in lower proportions, with minor amounts of glycolate and mesoxalate. In general, a thicker catalytic layer is associated with the formation of more oxidized products. (C) 2017 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据