4.7 Article

Cu promoted Ni-Co/hydrotalcite catalyst for improved hydrogen production in comparison with several modified Ni-based catalysts via steam reforming of ethanol

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 42, 期 16, 页码 11321-11332

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.03.052

关键词

Hydrogen; Ethanol; Metal oxide; Cu promoted Ni-Co/hydrotalcite; Steam reforming

资金

  1. University Grants Commission Basic Sciences Research (UGC-BSR) JRF under Centre for Green Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Enhanced hydrogen production via catalytic steam reforming of ethanol has a huge potential. In the present investigation, several combinations of mixed metal oxide supported catalysts were evaluated for efficient and economical hydrogen generation from ethanol. The comparison was carried out in terms of ethanol conversion, hydrogen yield and cyclic stability over various catalyst-support systems. Several nickel based supported catalysts namely, Ni/MgO, Ni/Al2O3, Ni/CeO2 and Ni/ZrO2 were studied in this work among which Ni/MgO and Ni/Al2O3 showed satisfactory activity and stability for hydrogen production. Thereafter Ni/hydrotalcite (HTc)-type material was employed to combine features of the above catalysts which showed more than 90% ethanol conversion and yielded 82 mol% of hydrogen at optimized conditions. Finally, a novel combination of Cu promoted Ni-Co/HTc was synthesized and tested for improved hydrogen production. It showed almost complete conversion of ethanol (98.3%) with hydrogen yield of 83% at much lower temperature (673 K). The process conditions were optimized by studying effects of temperature, S/C ratio and GHSV on hydrogen production. Cu-Ni-Co/HTc also remained stable for up to 4 cycles justifying its multi-cycle activity, selectivity and durability. Such novel combination of catalyst-support system assists in improved hydrogen production in a sustainable manner. (C) 2017 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据