4.6 Article

Alfnoor: A Retrieval Simulation of the Ariel Target List

期刊

ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL
卷 160, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab9a53

关键词

Space telescopes; Exoplanet atmospheric composition; Transmission spectroscopy

资金

  1. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program [758892]
  2. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013)/ERC grant [617119]
  3. Science and Technology Funding Council (STFC) [ST/K502406/1, ST/P000282/1, ST/P002153/1, ST/S002634/1]
  4. ASI grant [2018.22.HH.O]
  5. STFC [ST/T001836/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, we present Alfnoor, a dedicated tool optimized for population studies of exoplanet atmospheres. Alfnoor combines the latest version of the retrieval algorithm, TauREx 3, with the instrument noise simulator ArielRad and enables the simultaneous retrieval analysis of a large sample of exo-atmospheres. We applied this tool to the Ariel list of planetary candidates and focus on hydrogen dominated, cloudy atmospheres observed in transit with the Tier-2 mode (medium Ariel resolution). As a first experiment, we randomized the abundances-ranging from 10(-7)to 10(-2)-of the trace gases, which include H2O, CH4, CO, CO2, and NH3. This exercise allowed us to estimate the detection limits for Ariel Tier-2 and Tier-3 modes when clouds are present. In a second experiment, we imposed an arbitrary trend between a chemical species and the effective temperature of the planet. A last experiment was run requiring molecular abundances being dictated by equilibrium chemistry at a certain temperature. Our results demonstrate the ability of Ariel Tier-2 and Tier-3 surveys to reveal trends between the chemistry and associated planetary parameters. Future work will focus on eclipse data, on atmospheres heavier than hydrogen, and will be applied also to other observatories.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据