4.7 Review

Review of spray cooling - Part 1: Single-phase and nucleate boiling regimes, and critical heat flux

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER
卷 115, 期 -, 页码 1174-1205

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.06.029

关键词

Spray cooling; Nucleate boiling; Critical heat flux (CHF)

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51506023]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2016T90220]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities of Ministry of Education of China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study is the first part of a two-part review of spray cooling, which addresses the relatively high-flux, low-temperature mechanisms and predictive tools associated with the single-phase liquid cooling and nucleate boiling regimes, as well as critical heat flux (CHF). The second part will be focused on the relatively high-temperature transition boiling and film boiling regimes, and the Leidenfrost point, which are encountered in quenching of metal alloy parts. In this part, key spray hydrodynamic parameters influencing heat transfer performance are identified, including volumetric flux, mean droplet diameter, and mean droplet velocity, This is followed by detailed identification of dominant mechanisms, data trends, correlations, and predictive models recommended by different research teams. Also discussed are spray cooling enhancement schemes, including micro and macro modifications to the surface itself, additives to the liquid, and use of nanofluids. Overall, contradictory findings point to a need for future experimental work that must be conducted systematically using many fluids with vastly different thermophysical properties, and broad ranges of operating conditions. There is also a need for further research to investigate parameters that influence CHF, including dissolved gas, spray inclination angle, and interaction between neigh-boring sprays when using multi-nozzle arrays to cool large surfaces. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据