4.7 Review

Studies on natural convection within enclosures of various (non-square) shapes - A review

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2016.08.034

关键词

Natural convection; Fluid or porous media; Triangular; Trapezoidal; Parallelogrammic; Curved walls

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Natural convection in an enclosure (internal convection) is an important problem due to its significant practical applications. In energy related applications, natural convection plays a dominant role in transport of energy for the proper design of enclosures in order to achieve higher heat transfer rates. This review summarizes the studies on natural convection heat transfer in triangular, trapezoidal, parallelogrammic enclosures and enclosures with curved and wavy walls filled with fluid or porous media. In addition, this review also summarizes the natural convection studies in the nanofluid filled enclosures. Studies have been performed for the enclosures subjected to different thermal boundary conditions. A number of the studies demonstrated that the variation of the aspect ratio and base angle of the triangular and rhombic/parallelogrammic enclosures had a wide influence on the flow distribution pattern. In the trapezoidal enclosure, the aspect ratio of the cavity as well as the presence of the baffles along the walls played a significant role in the temperature and flow distribution. The flow patterns within the complex enclosures were found to be largely dependent on the amplitude-wavelength ratio and number of undulations of the wavy walls. In addition, the researchers have also studied the effect of the various parameters such as the Rayleigh numbers, Prandtl numbers, Darcy numbers, Darcy Rayleigh number, irreversibility distribution ratios, volume fraction of the nanoparticles, etc. Overall, the current review paper presents an useful insight into the potential strategies for enhancing the convection heat transfer performance. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据