4.7 Article

Characterization of heat transfer enhancement and frictional losses in a two-pass square duct featuring unique combinations of rib turbulators and cylindrical dimples

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2016.09.037

关键词

Liquid crystal thermography; Nusselt number; Thermal hydraulic performance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Transient heat transfer experiments using liquid crystal thermography have been carried out on a two pass square channel for testing several unique combinations of ribs and cylindrical dimples. Four different rib shapes, viz. 45 degrees angled, V, W and M have been studied. In compound channels, the rib pitch accommodates cylindrical dimples arranged in the shape of the rib, hence following the direction of rib induced secondary flows. For each rib shape, three different configurations - rib alone, dimple alone and rib-dimpled compound cases were studied. The rib-height-to-channel hydraulic diameter ratio was 0.125 and rib-pitch-to-rib-height ratio was 16. The dimple-depth-to-print diameter ratio was 0.3. The experiments were carried out for a wide range of Reynolds number (19,500-69,000), covering a spectrum typically found in both land-based and air-breathing engines. A total of 52 experiments were carried out to measure detailed heat transfer coefficient on the bottom wall of the two-pass channel. A transient liquid crystal thermography technique was used for heat transfer measurement. Static pressure measurements were carried out to measure the overall pressure drop in the two pass channel. From globally averaged Nusselt number and overall pressure drop, thermal-hydraulic performance of the 13 configurations were determined, compared and analyzed. It has been observed that 45 degrees angled and V compound configurations resulted in higher heat transfer augmentation as well as higher thermal hydraulic performance when compared with their corresponding ribs alone and dimples alone configurations. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据