期刊
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS
卷 140, 期 1, 页码 11-17出版社
WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.12338
关键词
Anti-Mullerian hormone; Bipolar electrocoagulation; Endometrioma; Endometriosis; Hemostasis; Laparoscopy; Ovarian reserve; Stripping
BackgroundLaparoscopic stripping is the gold-standard treatment for ovarian endometriosis. The choice of hemostasis method might affect ovarian reserve. ObjectivesTo determine whether bipolar electrocoagulation is more detrimental to ovarian reserve than non-thermal hemostasis methods. Search strategyEntry terms associated with the MeSH terms endometrioma, laparoscopy, and ovarian reserve were used to search databases for articles published up to April 3, 2017, in English, Spanish, Portuguese, French, and Italian. Selection criteriaRandomized controlled trials comparing the 3-month postoperative serum anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) level in premenopausal women undergoing laparoscopic stripping with bipolar hemostasis or non-thermal hemostasis methods were selected. Data collection and analysisData were extracted by two independent reviewers and a meta-analysis was performed. Main resultsThree studies met the inclusion criteria; overall, 105 patients underwent surgery with bipolar electrocoagulation and 105 patients underwent surgery with an alternative hemostasis method. The AMH level 3months after surgery was decreased in the bipolar electrocoagulation group (mean difference -0.79ng/mL, 95% confidence interval -1.19 to -0.39). ConclusionsBipolar electrocoagulation negatively impacts ovarian reserve and should be avoided, especially for patients with reproductive goals. Bipolar electrocoagulation during laparoscopic ovarian endometrioma stripping is more detrimental to ovarian reserve than are hemostatic suturing and hemostatic matrix, and should be avoided.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据