4.5 Article

Grey Relational Analysis Method for Probabilistic Linguistic Multi-criteria Group Decision-Making Based on Geometric Bonferroni Mean

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FUZZY SYSTEMS
卷 20, 期 7, 页码 2234-2244

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s40815-017-0374-2

关键词

Probabilistic linguistic term sets; Geometric Bonferroni mean; Multi-criteria group decision-making; Grey relational analysis

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [71401026, 71432003, 71571148]
  2. National Social Science Foundation of China [14BGL152]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [ZYGX2014J100]
  4. Social Science Planning Project of the Sichuan Province [SC15C009]
  5. Major Project of the Sichuan Research Center of Electronic Commerce and Modern Logistics [DSWL16-3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In practical decision-making problems, probabilistic linguistic term sets (PLTSs) are a very useful and flexible way to represent the qualitative judgments of experts. The PLTSs also have strong ability to express the information vagueness and uncertainty in the real-world applications. Considering the interrelationship among the input arguments of PLTSs, we extend the geometric Bonferroni mean to the probabilistic linguistic environment and design an approach for the application of multi-criteria group decision-making with PLTSs. First, we develop the probabilistic linguistic geometric Bonferroni mean and the weighted probabilistic linguistic geometric Bonferroni mean (WPLGBM) operators. The properties of these aggregation operators are investigated. Second, we utilize the WPLGBM operators to fuse the information in the probabilistic linguistic multi-criteria group decision-making (PLMCGDM) problem, which can obtain much more information in the process of group decision-making. By introducing the grey relational analysis method, we present its extension and further design a new approach for the PLMCGDM. Finally, an example is given to elaborate our proposed algorithm and successfully validate its performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据