4.5 Article

Stability and in vitro release behaviour of encapsulated omega fatty acid-rich oils in lentil protein isolate-based microcapsules

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09637486.2017.1336513

关键词

Omega fatty acid-rich oil; lentil protein isolate; microencapsulation; storage stability; in vitro release behaviour

资金

  1. Saskatchewan Ministry of Agriculture
  2. Canada-Saskatchewan Growing Forward 2 Bi-lateral Agreement (ADF) [2015-0274]
  3. Saskatchewan Pulse Growers [PRO1610]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objective of this study was to investigate the use of a lentil protein isolate-based microcapsule design as a platform for entrapping different types of omega fatty acid-rich oil (e.g. canola, fish and flaxseed oils) and to characterise differences in the physical properties (e.g. moisture content, water activity, colour, wettability, particle size, surface oil and entrapment efficiency), storage stability and in vitro release behaviour of the entrapped oils. All microcapsules displayed similar physical properties regardless of the core material. Free fatty acid content, peroxide value, 2-thiobarbituric acid reactive substances and accelerated oxidation test were investigated between the free and encapsulated oils to determine protective effects from microencapsulation and found the wall material provided the greatest protective effect to the fish oils relative to the others. Based on an in vitro release assay, it was proposed that different intrinsic properties of fatty acids (e.g. polarity, conformation, chain length and number of double bonds) led to different release properties under simulated conditions. For instance, more encapsulated canola oil (similar to 8.9%) was released within simulated gastric fluid, whereas more encapsulated fish oil (similar to 73.4%) was released within simulated gastrointestinal fluids. Overall, the capsule design used in this study could be potentially used as a universal platform to deliver more healthy oils.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据