4.3 Article

Phenolic profiles and antioxidant activities of six Chinese pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) cultivars

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD PROPERTIES
卷 20, 期 -, 页码 S94-S107

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10942912.2017.1289960

关键词

Antioxidant activity; Cultivars; Pomegranate; Punicalagin; Total phenolic

资金

  1. Beijing Higher Education Young Elite Teacher Project [YETP0757]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China [YX2015-13]
  3. Special Found for Beijing Common Construction Project [2014GJ01]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [J1103516]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The physicochemical characteristics, phenolic contents, and antioxidant capacities of the juices, seeds, and peels of six pomegranate cultivars from Shandong and Xinjiang provinces of China were compared. Results showed that high variability occurred in the physicochemical properties of the fruits, including fruit size, 100-aril weight, juice yield, titratable acidity (TA), total reducing sugar (TS), total soluble solids (TSS), and TS/TA. Comparison of the distribution of the phenolic contents and antioxidant activities in the peels, juices, and seeds revealed that the pomegranate peels possessed much more phenolic components and stronger antioxidant activities than the seeds and juices. The phenolic components of pomegranate peels were structurally identified and quantified by ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrum (UPLC-DAD-ESI/MSn), and punicalagin (alpha- and beta-isomers) was found as the predominant phenolic component. Correlation analysis revealed that the antioxidant activities were highly positively correlated with the total phenolics and flavonoids. The above results indicated that the pomegranate peel was the most valuable part because of abundant total phenolics and high antioxidant activities, and the best cultivar for fresh consumption, juice extraction, and bioactive components preparation was SD-QP.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据