4.1 Review

Inflammation in cardiac injury, repair and regeneration

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN CARDIOLOGY
卷 30, 期 3, 页码 240-245

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000158

关键词

cytokine; inflammation; lymphocyte; macrophage; myocardial infarction

资金

  1. NIH [R01 HL76246, R01 HL85440]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review Cardiomyocyte necrosis activates an inflammatory response that serves to clear the injured myocardium from dead cells, and stimulates repair, but may also extend injury. This manuscript discusses new findings that advanced our understanding of the role of inflammation in cardiac injury and repair. Recent findings Recently published studies have identified interleukin-1 alpha and RNA released by necrotic cardiomyocytes as key danger signals that trigger the inflammatory response following infarction. Interleukin-1 promotes activation of a proinflammatory phenotype in leukocytes and fibroblasts, and delays myofibroblast transdifferentiation. Inhibitory lymphocytes play a crucial role in negative regulation of the postinfarction inflammatory response by modulating macrophage and fibroblast phenotype. Cardiac macrophages exhibit significant heterogeneity and phenotypic plasticity and may orchestrate the reparative response following infarction. In neonatal mice, resident embryonic macrophage subpopulations may promote a regenerative response. In contrast, in adult animals replacement of resident macrophage populations with monocyte-derived macrophages may induce inflammation while inhibiting cardiac regeneration. These exciting observations highlight the crucial role of macrophages in cardiac injury and repair, but should be interpreted with caution considering the limitations of murine models of neonatal myocardial injury. Summary Design of novel strategies to reduce cardiac injury, improve repair and promote regeneration is dependent on understanding of the cell biology of the inflammatory response.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据