4.7 Article

Hybrid polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell-lithium-ion battery powertrain testing platform - hybrid fuel cell electric vehicle emulator

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH
卷 41, 期 11, 页码 1596-1611

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/er.3736

关键词

proton exchange membrane fuel cell; lithium-ion battery; hybrid powertrain system; hybrid fuel cell electric vehicle

资金

  1. Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technologies RDI Programme (HySA) - Department of Science and Technology in South Africa [KP3-S03]
  2. National Key Basic Research Development Plan (973 Plan) [2013CB 632505]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51477125]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A testing and validation platform for hybrid fuel cell (FC)-lithium-ion battery (LIB) powertrain systems is investigated. The hybrid FC electric vehicle emulator enables testing of hybrid system components and complete hybrid power modules up to 25kW for application in electric light-duty vehicles, light electric vehicles and so forth. A hybrid system comprising a 10-kW(el) low-temperature polymer electrolyte membrane FC stack and an 11.5-kWh LIB pack is installed. The system supplies power to a 20-kW permanent magnet synchronous motor and a 25-kW alternating current asynchronous, electrically programmable dynamometer is used to simulate the vehicle load during testing at dynamic drive cycle. The steady-state performance tests of the direct current (DC) motor, DC/DC converter, low-temperature polymer electrolyte membrane FC stack and LIB are performed as well as dynamic tests of the complete hybrid system. The Economic Commission for Europe driving cycle is selected as a reference cycle to validate the investigated hybrid FC-LIB powertrain. An efficiency of 83% and 95% is measured for electric motor and DC/DC converter, respectively. An average stack efficiency of 50% is achieved. An average hydrogen consumption of 3.9 g * km(-1) is reached during the Economic Commission for Europe driving cycle test. Copyright (C) 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据