4.6 Article

Security Orchestration and Enforcement in NFV/SDN-Aware UAV Deployments

期刊

IEEE ACCESS
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 131779-131795

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3010209

关键词

Security management; Unmanned aerial vehicles; Performance evaluation; Network function virtualization; Monitoring; Internet of Things; IoT; cybersecurity; SDN; NFV; architecture

资金

  1. European Research Projects H2020 INSPIRE-5Gplus [871808]
  2. H2020 CyberSec4Europe project [830929]
  3. AXA Postdoctoral Scholarship - AXA Research Fund (Cyber-SecIoT project)
  4. Spanish Government through the FPI Programme [PRE2018-083731]
  5. PERSEIDES project [TIN2017-86885-R]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Software Defined Network (SDN) and Network Function Virtualization (NFV) are bringing many advantages to optimize and automatize security management at the network edge, enabling the deployment of virtual network security functions (VSFs) in MEC nodes, to strengthen the end-to-end security in IoT environments. The benefits could exploit in mobile MEC nodes on-boarded in Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV), as the UAVs would carry on-demand VSFs to particular physical locations. To that aim, this paper proposes a novel NFV/SDN-based zero-touch security management framework for automatic orchestration, configuration and deployment of lightweight VSF in MEC-UAVs, that considers diverse contextual factors, related to both physical and virtual conditions, to optimize the security orchestration. Our solution aims to deploy on-demand VSFs, such as virtual Firewalls (vFirewalls), vProxies, vIDS (Intrusion Detection Systems) and vAAA, to assist during emerging situations in particular physical locations, protecting and optimizing the managed IoT network, as well as replacing or supporting compromised physical devices like IoT gateways. The proposed solution has been implemented, deployed and evaluated in a real testbed with real drones, showing its feasibility and performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据