4.7 Article

Effect of inclusion on strength and conductivity of Cu-Ni-Si alloys with discontinuous precipitation

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 843, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.156006

关键词

Cu-Ni-Si alloy; Discontinuous precipitation; Ni2Si; Inclusion; Drawing

资金

  1. Global Frontier R&D Program on Global Frontier Hybrid Interface Materials R&D Center - Ministry of Science, ICT, and Future Planning [2013M3A6B1078874]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government (MSIP) [2018R1A5A6075959]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2013M3A6B1078874, 5199991414323] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of inclusion on the strength and conductivity of fully discontinuous precipitated Cu-Ni-Si alloys with and without inclusion was studied. No inclusions were observed in Cu-4.75Ni-1.13Si alloy, the Ni + Si content of which was close to the solubility limit, while they were formed in solution-treated Cu-6Ni-1.42Si alloy at 980 degrees C. The duration of aging for full discontinuous precipitation (DP) at 500 degrees C was found to be shorter in Cu-6Ni-1.42Si alloy than Cu-4.75Ni-1.13Si alloy. The strength/conductivity of Cu-6%Ni-1.42%Si alloy with inclusion was 1071 MPa/46% IACS, while it was 966 MPa/50% IACS for Cu-4.75Ni-1.13Si alloy without inclusion, after drawing to the strain of 4. The drawing-induced uni-directional alignment of fiber-like Ni2Si precipitates was believed to increase the conductivity of Cu-Ni-Si alloys by reducing the cross sectional area of lamellar precipitates for the passage of electrons. The increase in strength was possibly due the higher volume fraction of fiber-like Ni2Si precipitates, along with the smaller inter-distance between them, in Cu-6%Ni-1.42%Si alloy with inclusion, than Cu-4.75Ni-1.13Si alloy without inclusion. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据