4.6 Article

High-frequency asymptotics of the vertex function: Diagrammatic parametrization and algorithmic implementation

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 102, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.085106

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [FOR 723, ZUK 63, AN 815/41, 407372336, SFB/TRR 21]
  2. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [F41, I 2794-N35]
  3. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Unions Seventh Framework Program (FP/2007-2013)/ERC [306447]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11874263]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vertex functions are a crucial ingredient of several forefront many-body algorithms in condensed matter physics. However, the full treatment of their frequency and momentum dependence severely restricts numerical calculations. A significant advancement requires an efficient treatment of the high-frequency asymptotic behavior of the vertex functions. In this work, we first provide a detailed diagrammatic analysis of the high-frequency structures and their physical interpretation. Based on these insights, we propose a parametrization scheme, which captures the whole high-frequency domain for arbitrary values of the Coulomb interaction and electronic density, and we discuss the details of its algorithmic implementation in many-body solvers based on parquet equations as well as functional renormalization group schemes. Finally, we assess its validity by comparing our results for a single impurity Anderson model with exact diagonalization calculations. The proposed parametrization is pivotal for the algorithmic development of all quantum many-body methods based on vertex functions arising from both local and nonlocal static microscopic interactions as well as effective dynamic interactions which uniformly approach a static value for large frequencies. In this way, our present technique can substantially improve vertex-based diagrammatic approaches including spatial correlations beyond dynamical mean-held theory.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据