4.7 Review

Reviewing global estimates of surface reactive nitrogen concentration and deposition using satellite retrievals

期刊

ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
卷 20, 期 14, 页码 8641-8658

出版社

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/acp-20-8641-2020

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41471343, 41425007, 41101315]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Since the industrial revolution, human activities have dramatically changed the nitrogen (N) cycle in natural systems. Anthropogenic emissions of reactive nitrogen (N-r) can return to the earth's surface through atmospheric N-r deposition. Increased N-r deposition may improve ecosystem productivity. However, excessive N-r deposition can cause a series of negative effects on ecosystem health, biodiversity, soil, and water. Thus, accurate estimations of N-r deposition are necessary for evaluating its environmental impacts. The United States, Canada and Europe have successively launched a number of satellites with sensors that allow retrieval of atmospheric NO2 and NH3 column density and therefore estimation of surface N-r concentration and deposition at an unprecedented spatiotemporal scale. Atmosphere NH3 column can be retrieved from atmospheric infra-red emission, while atmospheric NO2 column can be retrieved from reflected solar radiation. In recent years, scientists attempted to estimate surface N-r concentration and deposition using satellite retrieval of atmospheric NO2 and NH3 columns. In this study, we give a thorough review of recent advances of estimating surface N-r concentration and deposition using the satellite retrievals of NO2 and NH3, present a framework of using satellite data to estimate surface N-r concentration and deposition based on recent works, and summarize the existing challenges for estimating surface N-r concentration and deposition using the satellite-based methods. We believe that exploiting satellite data to estimate N-r deposition has a broad and promising prospect.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据