3.8 Article

Anti-blackness, surface-level diversity continues to matter: what must we do?

期刊

EQUALITY DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION
卷 39, 期 7, 页码 749-759

出版社

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/EDI-06-2020-0160

关键词

Anti-blackness; Police brutality; Discrimination; Surface-level diversity; Black lives matter

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose This paper discusses the author's perceptions of anti-blackness, her research on surface-level diversity and her recommendations for faculty, administrators and allies. Design/methodology/approach The paper is a personal account, drawn from the author's background and experiences teaching and studying diversity. It discusses research on American Blacks' unique experiences with police violence and discrimination in employment, housing, customer service, healthcare and education consistent with anti-blackness. Findings Anti-blackness pervades Blacks' everyday experiences, including in academic institutions. Research limitations/implications This paper is a viewpoint paper. Researchers should study anti-blackness, looking specifically at Blacks' organizational and societal experiences. Practical implications The author provides suggestions for faculty regarding sharing their research findings, teaching about anti-blackness in diversity, human resources, organizational behavior, management and other courses along with mentoring doctoral students. Recommendations for administration to help ensure that Black faculty are hired, valued and supported are also provided. Social implications Efforts to identify, acknowledge and dismantle anti-blackness are critical to Blacks and are important to improving diversity, inclusion and equity in society. Originality/value This paper provides the author's perspective on anti-blackness, using her personal perceptions and experiences, coupled with research evidence. The author provides suggestions for faculty and administrators based on decades of research and experience in the field and being Black in an anti-black society.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据