4.6 Article

Elastic-plastic fracture mechanics approach for stress corrosion cracking of nickel aluminium bronze under ammonia-containing artificial seawater

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DAMAGE MECHANICS
卷 27, 期 5, 页码 729-753

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1056789517702210

关键词

Stress corrosion cracking; bronze; elastic-plastic fracture mechanics; finite element analysis; corrosion testing

资金

  1. Royal Thai Navy
  2. Thailand Commission on Higher Education of Thailand (the National Research University Project)
  3. Royal Golden Jubilee PhD Program
  4. Thailand Research Fund (TRF)
  5. National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT)
  6. National Metal and Materials Technology Center (MTEC), Thailand

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the growth of urbanization and industries, the seawater near coastal areas has become polluted, and the nickel aluminium bronze components around coastal areas are affected by ammonia-containing seawater. Unfortunately, the influence of the ammonia concentration in seawater on the stress corrosion cracking of thin nickel aluminium bronze components with large plastic zones at the defects has not been evaluated before. In the present work, stress corrosion cracking experiments on nickel aluminium bronze components under artificial seawater and ammonia-containing artificial seawater were conducted using a four-point bending technique. The elastic-plastic fracture mechanics parameter (J-integral) was evaluated using finite element analysis. The J-integral successfully characterized the crack growth rate under the present corrosive environments. Stress corrosion cracking was possible under both artificial seawater and ammonia-containing artificial seawater. The threshold J-integral for susceptibility to stress corrosion cracking (J(SCC)) and fracture toughness (J(C)) was the highest for stress corrosion cracking under artificial seawater and decreased as the amount of ammonium hydroxide added to the artificial seawater increased.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据