4.7 Article

Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotations

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER VISION
卷 123, 期 1, 页码 32-73

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11263-016-0981-7

关键词

Computer vision; Dataset; Image; Scene graph; Question answering; Objects; Attributes; Relationships; Knowledge; Language; Crowdsourcing

资金

  1. Stanford Computer Science Department
  2. Yahoo Labs
  3. Brown Institute for Media Innovation
  4. Toyota
  5. Adobe
  6. ONR MURI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite progress in perceptual tasks such as image classification, computers still perform poorly on cognitive tasks such as image description and question answering. Cognition is core to tasks that involve not just recognizing, but reasoning about our visual world. However, models used to tackle the rich content in images for cognitive tasks are still being trained using the same datasets designed for perceptual tasks. To achieve success at cognitive tasks, models need to understand the interactions and relationships between objects in an image. When asked What vehicle is the person riding?, computers will need to identify the objects in an image as well as the relationships riding(man, carriage) and pulling(horse, carriage) to answer correctly that the person is riding a horse-drawn carriage. In this paper, we present the Visual Genome dataset to enable the modeling of such relationships. We collect dense annotations of objects, attributes, and relationships within each image to learn these models. Specifically, our dataset contains over 108K images where each image has an average of objects, attributes, and pairwise relationships between objects. We canonicalize the objects, attributes, relationships, and noun phrases in region descriptions and questions answer pairs to WordNet synsets. Together, these annotations represent the densest and largest dataset of image descriptions, objects, attributes, relationships, and question answer pairs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据