4.7 Article

Novel flexible solid-state pseudo-parallel pseudocapacitor with manganese oxide active material synthesized using electrodeposition

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 843, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.156017

关键词

Carbon cloth; Energy storage; Flexible; MnO2; Pseudo-parallel pseudocapacitor

资金

  1. Young Scholar Fellowship Program by Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) in Taiwan [MOST 108-2636-E-027-003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Flexible and light-weight energy storage device is required for soft electronics. Novel flexible solid-state pseudo-parallel pseudocapacitor (SPP) with three electrodes is firstly proposed to achieve light-weight and excellent energy storage ability. SPP is assembled using only three electrodes without outer circuit. Active material of delta-MnO2 is fabricated on carbon cloth (CC) using electrodeposition with different currents. Highest specific capacitance of 9.41 F/cm(2) is obtained for MnO2 /CC electrode prepared using 30 mA, due to high surface area, large pore volume and suitable pore structure of nanosheet array. Normal-type pseudocapacitor (NP), two normal-type pseudocapacitor connected in parallel (NP in parallel), and two types of SPP are assembled using optimized MnO2/CC positive electrode and activated carbon negative electrode. The SPP composed of two positive electrodes and one negative electrode (PNP) shows best energy storage ability with energy density of 97.09 Wh/kg at power density of 0.65 W/kg, owing to more MnO2 pseudocapacitor electrode and better device configuration. However, worse charge/discharge stability is observed for PNP owing to lacking sufficient carbon material for providing stable electric double layer capacitor energy storage mechanism. This work greatly opens new blueprint for designing device configurations to achieve light-weight and efficient energy storage ability for flexible solid-state pseudocapacitors. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据