4.6 Article

Influence of stepwise oxidation on the structure, stability, and properties of planar pentacoordinate carbon species CAl5+

期刊

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 22, 期 30, 页码 17062-17067

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0cp01106a

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSFC [21720102006, 21273140, 21471092]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shanxi Province [201901D111018, 201901D111014]
  3. One Hundred-Talent Program of Shanxi Province
  4. OIT Program
  5. Shanxi 1331 Project'' Engineering Research Center [PT201807]
  6. Shanxi 1331KIRT
  7. HPC of Shanxi University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Computational design has played an important role in planar hyper-coordinate carbon (phC) chemistry. However, none of numerous computationally predicted phC species were subsequently successfully synthesized in the condensed phase, perhaps due to the frustrating issue of oxidation. In the present work, we studied the influence of stepwise oxidation on the structure, stability, and properties of phC species using the milestone planar pentacoordinate carbon (ppC) species CAl5+ as an example. Our results indicated that the ppC structure of CAl5+ would be directly destroyed with one, two, or six O atom(s) per molecule present and indirectly with three or four O atoms, but maintained with five O atoms due to the ppC isomer of CAl5O5+ being a kinetically stable global energy minimum displaying sigma and pi double aromaticity. Moreover, the magnitudes of the first to fifth vertical oxygen affinities (VOAs) for CAl5+ were determined to be very high (-85.5 to -116.3 kcal mol(-1)), probably due to the existence of peripheral diffuse Al-Al bond(s). However, the sixth VOA was reduced significantly to -50.2 kcal mol(-1), consistent with the absence of any diffuse Al-Al bond in the corresponding CAl5O5+ species. So CAl5O5+ may be insensitive to oxidation. Therefore, the ppC species D-5h CAl5O5+ might be resistant to being degraded under a delicate control of oxidation level (producing five O atoms per CAl5+ molecule).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据