4.6 Review

Aldosterone Pathway Blockade to Prevent Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 231, 期 -, 页码 155-161

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.12.029

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Despite advances in therapeutic interventions AF remains a progressive and symptomatic disease. Therefore, novel therapeutic interventions targeting the underlying arrhythmogenic substrate for AF is needed. Atrial fibrosis is an important component of the arrhythmogenic substrate of AF and may be initiated by aldosterone binding to the mineralocorticoid receptor. We hypothesized that aldosterone pathway blockade with mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) reduces atrial fibrosis, and thus AF. Methods: We searched OVID MEDLINE, OVID EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to June 10th, 2016 for randomized controlled trials (RCT) and observational studies addressing MRA and providing information on AF occurrence. Two independent reviewers selected and appraised the data. We performed random-effects meta-analyses. Summary odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Results: We included 14 studies, 5 RCT and 9 observational cohorts, with a cumulative number of 5332 patients (male: 74.9%, age: 65.3 years); 2397 (45.0%) received an MRA (spironolactone or eplerenone). During follow-up, 204 (8.5%) patients treated with MRAs, developed AF, compared to 547 (18.6%) patients, without MRA treatment. Meta-analyses showed a significant overall reduction of AF risk in MRA treated patients (OR: 0.48 CI: 0.38-0.60 p < 0.001), including a reduction of new-onset AF (OR: 0.52 CI: 0.37-0.74 p < 0.001) and recurrent AF (OR: 0.37 CI: 0.24-0.57 p < 0.001), but not post-operative AF (POAF) (OR: 0.60 CI: 0.33-1.09 p = 0.09). Conclusions: MRAs significantly reduce new-onset AF and recurrent AF, but not POAF. MRA treatment can be considered an additive therapeutic strategy in AF. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据